Cloverfield [Blu-ray] | ![Cloverfield [Blu-ray]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51YpK0YYMSL._SL160_.jpg)
 enlarge | Director: Matt Reeves
Actors: Mike Vogel, T.j. Miller, Lizzy Caplan, Jessica Lucas, Odette Yustman
Studio: Paramount
Category: DVD
List Price: $39.99
Buy New: $16.09
You Save: $23.90 (60%)
New (24) Used (7) from $16.09
Rating:  552 reviews
Sales Rank: 103
Format: Ac-3, Color, Dolby, Dubbed, Subtitled, Widescreen
Languages: English (Original Language), French (Original Language), Spanish (Original Language), English (Subtitled), French (Subtitled), Portuguese (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled), French (Dubbed), Spanish (Dubbed)
Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Media: Blu-ray
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 84
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 9 x 6 x 0.5
MPN: 132854
UPC: 097361328546
EAN: 0097361328546
ASIN: B0018QCXGY
Theatrical Release Date: January 18, 2008
Release Date: June 3, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Brand New Sealed!!!! ships now first class! all our items are gauranteed!
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Five young New Yorkers throw their friend a going-away party the night that a monster the size of a skyscraper descends upon the city. Told from the point of view of their video camera the film is a document of their attempt to survive the most surreal horrifying event of their livesSystem Requirements:Running Time: 84 minutesFormat: BLU-RAY DISC Genre: SCI-FI/FANTASY/MONSTERS & MUTANTS Rating: PG-13 UPC: 097361328546 Manufacturer No: 132854
Amazon.com
One of the first things a viewer notices about Cloverfield is that it doesn't play by ordinary storytelling rules, making this intriguing horror film as much a novelty as an event. Told from the vertiginous point-of-view of a camcorder-wielding group of friends, Cloverfield begins like a primetime television soap opera about young Manhattanites coping with changes in their personal lives. Rob (Michael Stahl-David) is leaving New York to take an executive job at a company in Japan. At his goodbye party in a crowded loft, Rob's brother Jason (Mike Vogel) hands a camcorder to best friend Hud (T.J. Miller), who proceeds to tape the proceedings over old footage of Rob's ex-girlfriend, Beth (Odette Yustman)--images shot during happy times in that now-defunct relationship. Naturally, Beth shows up at the party with a new beau, bumming Rob out completely. Just before one's eyes glaze over from all this heartbreaking stuff (captured by Hud, who's something of a doofus, in laughably shaky camerawork), the unexpected happens: New York is suddenly under attack from a Godzilla-like monster stomping through midtown and destroying everything and everybody in sight. Rob and company hit the streets, but rather than run with other evacuees, they head toward the center of the storm so that Rob can rescue an injured Beth. There are casualties along the way, but the journey into fear is fascinating and immediate if emotionally remote--a consequence of seeing these proceedings through the singular, subjective perspective of a camcorder and of a story that intentionally leaves major questions unanswered: Who or what is this monster? Where did it come from? The lack of a backstory, and spare views of the marauding creature, are clever ways by producer J.J. Abrams and director Matt Reeves to keep an audience focused exclusively on what's on the screen. But it also makes Cloverfield curiously uninvolving. Ultimately, Cloverfield, with its spectacular effects brilliantly woven into a home-video look, is a celebration of infinite possibilities in this age of accessible, digital media. --Tom Keogh
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 547 more reviews...
 Spoilers Galore July 25, 2008
CLOVERFIELD boasts a grade Z cast of unknown actors in an attempt, I expect, not only to save money but also to keep a low profile with the fanboy set, for it's not like photographers crowding around a Johnny Depp set, is it, there are almost 100 per cent nobodies in the cast. Wonder if any of them will be able to get a job on the back of this film--I hope so, since no one is really bad, except for the jackass holding the camera, who proves that whatever Seth Rogen has, he's not sharing it with his peers. I looked up his name in the credits, says it's "T. J. Miller," the sort of name female impersonators in the 50s used to go by to confuse nightclub patrons. But he plays "Hud," and otherwise steers clear of the androgynous spirit, always playing the big dumb guy so, he's consistent. No one's superbad, ha ha, and a few of the actors actually rise to the challenge and give it a go.
The best known actor, Mike Vogel, does a "Janet Leigh" here, which must have confounded all Vogel fans who paid good hard money to get into the theater! How'd you like it if, when you paid $12 to see a Jim Carrey movie, and then you find out that after 15 minutes, Jim Carrey's off somewhere else doing another movie? I'd be annoyed, but luckily for most of us that's around when we start getting glimpses of the hideous monster devouring Manhattan and the thrills and chills start exploding left and right!
Vogel is great by the way, and I am sure he'll go on to better parts, hopefully longer ones too. Maybe for his next movie he could come in for the last 20 minutes and people will be glad to see him--maybe a remake of SAVING PRIVATE RYAN sort of thing?
 Terrible July 25, 2008
Without a doubt, one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I thought Blair Witch Project was bad. Cloverfield makes Blair Witch look like a classic. The Director of this movies should not be given any more movies to direct. The actors should all report to the unemployment office and seek retraining in another field. This qualifies for the biggest rasberry of all time. I can't believe they charged money to see this movie. I feel as though I have been robbed. If this movie was a building it would be condemed; it's that bad.
Worth watching on DVD July 25, 2008
By reading the other reviews, I get the feeling that many of their authors are basing their reviews of their experiences in the theater. I have seen this movie on the small-screen only, and will state that the hand-held camera point-of-view of this movie is not that bad when seen on a 21-inch screen. You still all the important details of each scene, without getting sick in either the head or stomach.
Now to the story itself. New York City is being wrecked by a 300-feet tall monster. This creature has two short hind legs and two long front legs that also double as arms. The creature's skin looks smooth and dark, and its head is long with teeth inside a horizontal mouth and what seems like two short horns; one beside each side of the mouth. Overall, the monster has a general body outline of a stretched frog. The monster does not breathe fire, or shoot anything out of any orifice, or fly. But it does carry around multitudes of smaller creatures, each about the size of a large dog. These smaller creatures look like gigantic locusts; a skinny body with a hard exoskeleton, six long jointed legs, an ability to crawl up walls and jump really high. The difference is that these smaller creatures are each armed with a long jaw full of sharp teeth. At first, I thought they were offspring of the bigger monster, but then I watched the special features. One of the special features basically explains that this 300-foot creature is an alien baby that crawled out of NYC harbor and into the city. Like a human baby who has just come across a pen full of new toys, there is a lot of screaming, biting, kicking and knocking things over. So with our baby monster; it knocks buildings over, bites people, and roars a lot. The smaller dog-sized creatures are most likely parasites living on the skin of the bigger monster; like fleas on a dog.
Now to the positives and negatives. Positives first. The monster looks real and original. The special effects are wonderful. The smaller insect-like creatures are really scary. And the cast is comprised of unknowns, which is original for action flick. Now the negatives.
kewl flick, but a bit nauseating July 23, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
i loved this movie and saw it in the theater as soon as it came out. i think the lost camera thing helped make it very realistic and entertaining. the only part i didn't like was when they were at the party in the beginning and swinging the camera all around madly. it has some crashes, gore, sprinting down manhatten streets covered in glass and rubble in just bare feet. yes, they all die except lily,and people say that's depressing. so what? people die.
all in all, a good movie, though maybe not one you'd want to see with little kids or your grandparents.
Biggest waste of time ever! July 21, 2008
2 out of 7 found this review helpful
I've never been so angry about such an overrated and overhyped movie as Cloverfield. First 20 minutes NOTHING happens. I was so bored I could scream. The rest of this poor excuse for a movie was dull, dull, dull. Totally forgettable noname actors, no excitement, almost no dialog, no explanation for anything. The ending was the icing on this awful cake. Nothing happens in the ending either. Even the title is dull, as it makes no sense.
All those involved in making this film should be blacklisted by the studios from ever getting funding for future films.
|
|
|
