Emma (A&E, 1997) | 
 enlarge | Director: Diarmuid Lawrence
Actors: Kate Beckinsale, Bernard Hepton, Mark Strong (ii), Samantha Bond, James Hazeldine
Studio: A&E Home Video
Category: DVD
List Price: $19.95
Buy New: $7.90
You Save: $12.05 (60%)
New (42) Used (13) from $7.90
Rating:  157 reviews
Sales Rank: 922
Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dvd-video, Ntsc
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Subtitled)
Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 107
Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1
DVD Layers: 1
DVD Sides: 1
Picture Format: Academy Ratio
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5.4 x 0.6
MPN: 733961700275
ISBN: 0767020308
UPC: 733961700275
EAN: 9780767020305
ASIN: 0767020308
Theatrical Release Date: February 16, 1997
Release Date: October 26, 1999
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: BRAND NEW AND FACTORY SEALED
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
Similar to the equally excellent Valmont, this version of Jane Austen's classic novel had the misfortune of following a sumptuous big-star version with Gwyneth Paltrow, which was released the summer before. And, just as 1989's Valmont suffered comparisons with Dangerous Liaisons, inevitably these Emmas were held up next to one another. This delicious Emma concerns a young woman of financial substance (Kate Beckinsale), who fancies herself a matchmaker, especially with shy Miss Harriet Smith (Samantha Morton, who also appears in A&E's Jane Eyre). In Emma's swirling world of social activity and social consciousness, one's position and stature is a constant preoccupation. But to her credit, Emma, albeit a busybody, has compassion for all classes, and for her kindly but hypochondriacal father (Bernard Hepton). This miniseries is more subtle than the grand theatrical release, is truer to the novel, and gives a richer explanation of the relationship between Emma associates Jane Fairfax (beautiful Olivia Williams of Rushmore) and the duplicitous Frank Churchill (Raymond Coulthard). Of course, at the center, as in all Austen stories, is the romance between the unsuspecting leading lady and an unlikely, but wholly suitable gentleman. In this case, it's Emma and her brother-in-law, the righteous (as played here) Mr. Knightley (Mark Strong). Strong's Mr. Knightley is more reserved, less coy than Jeremy Northam's; he plays Knightley more like Mr. Darcy (the leading man in Austen's Pride and Prejudice, which A&E also offers in a wonderful miniseries). Beckinsale proves to be utterly delightful and in no way should this excellent adaptation be ignored. --N.F. Mendoza
Product Description
Emma Woodhouse imagines that she dominates those around her in the small town of Highbury, but her matchmaking creates problems for herself and others.
Genre: Feature Film-Drama
Rating: NR
Release Date: 26-OCT-1999
Media Type: DVD
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 152 more reviews...
 3 maybe 3 1/2 September 6, 2008
Not quite what I was expecting, but it's a cute movie. Pride and Prejudice, and Sense and Sensibility get 5 stars in my book. But this is a good movie too.
4.5 August 16, 2008
I did watch this AFTER watching the 1996 Gwyneth Paltrow version and do prefer this one.
I'm not a Kate Beckinsale fan, she does Emma well. She's more proper and more restrained than Paltrow. The scene that sticks in my mind most is her face after Knightley chews her out for being mean to Miss Bates.
I definitely preferred this George Knightley. Davies does a better job of showing Knightley as a person rather than a plot mover; it was far clearer that he was a responsible landowner, riding out to check on his workers and striking up a friendship with a tenant farmer like Robert Martin. He also feels older than Emma in this version, as it was in the book. Mark Strong, of course, is an excellent actor and does this character wonderfully.
One of the strengths of this version is its Frank Churchill and Jane Fairfax. This Frank is good, but then it's not hard to beat the Miramax version, which had me laughing (at it). Olivia Williams, though, was to me the memorable Jane Fairfax: quiet, put-upon, long-suffering - she captured Jane Fairfax in a nutshell. Williams' performance drove home what every reader and viewer feels at the end: Jane deserves so much more than that jerk Churchill. Loved it.
Lucy Robinson, fresh from being the annoying yes-woman Mrs. Hurst to Anna Chancellor's Caroline Bingley, is Mrs. Elton; Samantha Morton, Harriet Smith. Both are good performances, and at least for me, on par with their Hollywood counterparts. Of course, Harriet drives me nuts with her spinelessness, so I'm not a good person to judge any Harriet Smith.
A definite plus: showing Emma's nephew. A key line running through the novel is Emma's reluctance for George Knightley to marry. She believes she doesn't want Knightley to marry because of disinheritance; Emma's older sister is married to George's younger brother, and their son (Emma and George's nephew) Henry is George Knightley's heir. Emma says her primary fear is that Henry will be disinherited if Knightley marries and produces a son, and that is her ostensible reason for opposing Mrs. Weston's suggestion that Knightley favors Jane Fairfax and Harriet's affection for Knightley. It's not until later she realizes that her own feelings for Knightley are playing as large a role as Henry's disinheritance in her reluctance for him to marry. This aspect comes out very well in this version of "Emma".
If I had to choose one (which I didn't; I have both), I'd choose this one. It's overall a more faithful version.
 Ummm...no thanks August 7, 2008
Please do not bring out ye flogs and whipping posts. I just didn't like this version of "Emma". Specifically, I REALLY did not like Kate Beckinsale's take on Emma. She came across as snobby and frankly unlikeable. Maybe that is staying true to the literary character but still, not a pleasant person. Maybe I can blame Gwenyth for my dislike, she spoiled me with her sweet, naive portrayal of Emma. However, many reviewers here have valid points regarding this version of "Emma" (Knightley, for example, seems to be just right) but in the final analysis, I'm sticking with Ms. Paltrow
 Difinitive Emma July 22, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This is a really difinitive production of Emma. Aside from the slightly jujeune leading lady (which gets her correctly - even Jane Austen knew she was somewhat dislikable), played excellently by Kate Beckinsale, we have the best Jane Faifax in gorgeous and extemely talented Olivia Williams. William's Jane is highlighted by some of the prettiest music pieces chosen for Jane - which is part of the character's prowess, and "makes" her for us as an audience (whether or not she is actually playing it). And superlatively talented Samantha Morton perfectly cast as the sweet odd-duck. She is so believably sweet and dim, she is a joy.
This version is a bit more wintery and indoor than the version relesed just before it - that one is more summer and green. But despite some really good performances in the other, this one is so much better on all levels it is silly to compare them. The Direction here is really good, giving all three of the young heroines some breathing space in their own environment from time to time, which really helps us feel and care for each of them. And we finally DO care for Emma because she gets a resounding come-uppance.
For anyone who thinks Beckinsale's Emma is too dislikable, see the 1970s version - a long, detailed "play for tv" version in which Emma is extremely cold, disapproving and you just want to slap her... often. (Still it is an on-target performance and worth seeing.)
Love Anything Austen June 21, 2008
I love Jane Austen! EMMA is a wonderful movie. Please read the book and see the movie....it's great to see the characters come to life.
I prefer the full screen to the wide screen versions though.
|
|
|
